Mon 28 Aug 2017, 09:02 GMT

VPS director highlights need for MFM fuel delivery monitoring


First few months following mandatory MFM bunkering shows fuel deliveries require expert performance monitoring, says Steve Bee.



By Steve Bee - Group Commercial & Business Development Director

Recent events in Singapore have seen the Maritime Port Authority (MPA) take strong action against a fuel supplier by revoking their licence, following checks which uncovered unauthorised alterations made to the pipelines on board a number of the supplier's bunker tankers between the mass flow meter (MFM) and the flow boom. Such alterations had allowed bunker fuel measured by the MFM to be siphoned out and undermine the accuracy of the readings from the MFM system.

Such alterations and actions prove there are still individuals within the region who are prepared to risk unauthorised practices in relation to fuel delivery. This is despite the commendable efforts of the MPA to introduce a technology which aims to assist in placing Singapore at the forefront as a transparent, efficient and ethical port in which to deliver and receive bunker fuel.

The above issues also prove that the MFM is not a simple 'plug & play' device, but is an integral part of the wider fuel delivery system. On its own, the MFM is not the sole resolution to past problems, however a greater understanding of the MFM technology, linked to a comprehensive understanding of marine fuel delivery, will certainly ensure best practice can be monitored and reported.

Therefore the role and value of the bunker quantity surveyor has in fact increased within Singapore, rather than the pre-MFM-implementation perception that such a role may diminish.

Within the TR48 technical reference document for bunkering via mass flow meters, the BQS surveyor is highlighted on over 90 occasions, specifically:

- Clause 10.1.5 - mandatory documents to be issued by Surveyor.

- Clause 10.3 - Pre-delivery

- Clause 10.3.6 - Sampling

- Clause 10.4 - Bunkering operation

- Clause 10.5 - Post-delivery Checks and Documentation

- Clause 10.7.1. Metering Stoppage/Failure - 10.7.1.2 - back to manual measurement.

- Clause 10.7.6.1 - Quantity Dispute

- Annex A - Safety Health and the Environment

The role of the surveyor in relation to monitoring fuel deliveries via MFM includes:

Checking :

- MFM approval for 'use in trade', Meter calibration record, Meter zero verification report, Bunker tanker's meter totalizer log, System seals.

- Witness setting of meter reading to zero, Monitor whether stripping is done, Witness meter reading at the end of the bunkering. Obtain copy of Metering Ticket.

- Ascertain vessel's received quantity. Calculate and report vessel's R.O.B.

- Ensure proper sampling is done at the correct location by all concerned and seal numbers recorded on the BDN.

- Quantity differences (+/-) reported, Quantity difference investigated and necessary documents obtained.

- Bunker/meter profile obtained - When agreed between both parties.

Since 2015, VPS Surveyors have been monitoring MFM fuel delivery in Singapore, comparing the vessels manual measurements versus the bunker tanker's MFM measurements. Results recorded between 2015-2016, showed 45% of deliveries agreed within 0.5% of each other and 70% of deliveries within 1% of each other. However, the first six months of 2017 has shown a slight improvement, with 51% of deliveries having a volume agreement between vessel manual measurements and bunker tanker MFM measurement of within +/- 0.5%. The remaining 49% is equally split between apparent gain or loss, to the vessel. This would suggest that in approximately 25% of cases, the vessel is likely to claim a shortage.

The introduction of MFM, as an almost 'black-box' technology, was of course always going to be subject to a potential degree of scepticism from crew inexperienced with such technology. Therefore VPS's employment of an expert flow-technologist and the introduction of services, MFM Quick-Screen and MFM-Full Investigation, were introduced in early 2017 to protect the interest of the fuel purchaser and the crew on-board the receiving vessel.

With respect to the MFM Quick-Screen service, VPS have customers who require field assessment of the MFM profile. This service sees the surveyor collect and check MFM field documents including pictures of the meter profile. Our MFM Technologist, then reviews each case for 23 parameters, highlighting which, if any, could potentially be in breach TR48 and gives a 'pass' or 'fail' rating relative to TR48 requirements.

VPS MFM Quick-Screen data has shown a number of deliveries failing to comply with TR48 due to parameters such as tank stripping, line clearing, low cut-off values (LFC), the minimum measured quantity (MMQ), minimum mass flow rate (Qmin), zero verification and meter totalizer log. Following a MFM Quick-Screen 'fail', VPS can provide a more detailed MFM investigation to comprehensively prove the initial findings, including analysis of the MFM profile ASCII file and transmitter configuration report.

So the first few months following mandatory MFM fuel delivery in Singapore, has shown the whole fuel delivery system, including MFM technology, requires expert performance monitoring and assessment, along with the detailed checking of the relevant documentation. As such, guided by the MPA and TR48 requirements, VPS MFM-Screening and Investigation Services, plus experienced bunker quantity surveyors, can provide the expertise to assist in ensuring receipt of compliant and full fuel deliveries.


Graphic promoting Auramarine webinar titled 'Sustainable Fueling Part 3: Ammonia - next alternative fuel in marine'. Auramarine to host webinar on ammonia as marine fuel in April  

Finnish firm will explore ammonia’s role in maritime decarbonisation at its third spring webinar.

Front cover of study by WinGD and Envision Energy titled 'Renewable Fuel Economics: An OPEX illustration based on current costs'. Green ammonia could reach cost parity with VLSFO and LNG by 2050, study finds  

WinGD and Envision Energy study projects green ammonia operational costs competitive with conventional marine fuels.

Elenger Marine's LNG bunkering vessel Optimus alongside Brittany Ferries’ Saint-Malo. Bureau Veritas verifies methane emissions on Brittany Ferries’ LNG vessels  

Verification enables ferry operator to report measured methane slip instead of regulatory default values.

Map showing existing and planned Emission Control Areas (ECAs). Alliance calls for urgent black carbon action as new Arctic emission control areas take effect  

Canadian Arctic and Norwegian Sea ECAs now in force, with compliance deadline set for March 2027.

Artistic impression of battery-electric ferry for operation on Perth’s Swan River. Lloyd’s Register to class Western Australia’s first electric ferry fleet  

Echo Marine Group partners with Lloyd’s Register on five battery-electric ferries for Perth’s Swan River.

Thomas Kazakos, secretary general of The International Chamber of Shipping (ICS). ICS condemns Middle East shipping attacks as 20,000 seafarers remain trapped  

Industry body calls for urgent state action to resupply vessels and enable crew changes.

Molslinjen ferry illustration. Molslinjen order propels Australia to top of battery vessel production rankings  

Danish ferry operator’s three-catamaran order at Incat Tasmania shifts global manufacturing landscape, analysis shows.

Petrobras logo. Petrobras doubles invoiced price of MGO and LSMGO  

Export tax by Brazil's federal government forces Petrobras to double distillate invoice values.

Bunkering of Viking Line's Viking Glory by a Gasum vessel in Turku, Finland. Gasum renews FuelEU Maritime pooling partnerships with Viking Line and Wallenius SOL  

Nordic energy company extends compliance pooling arrangements with two shipping companies operating bio-LNG vessels.

Naming ceremony for CMA CGM Carmen on 18 March 2026. CMA CGM names methanol-powered container ship CMA CGM Carmen  

French shipping line christens 15,000-teu vessel as part of its alternative fuel fleet expansion.