Mon 24 Jan 2011, 06:08 GMT

Malaysian supplier to press charges against crew


Bunker firm says it had nothing to do with illegal transfer of marine fuel.



The owner of a Malaysian tanker that was caught illegally transferring marine fuel near Pontian, Johor, claims that it was the work of the crew and had nothing to do with the company.

Speaking to local daily The Star, Andrew Hean, a partner of vessel owner and bunker supply firm Ban Hoe Leong Marine Supplies Sdn. Bhd (BHL Marine) said that the activities had been going on without their knowledge.

A total of 19 crewmen were detained by local authorities on Thursday for illegally transferring marine fuel from the Malaysian tanker Arowana Barcelona to the Singapore-registered ship Ocean Samudera.

The crewmen were detained under Section 491(B) of the Merchant Shipping Act 1953 for allegedly transferring 50,000 litres of marine fuel worth around MYR75,000 (US$ 25,000).

According to police authorities, the vessels were spotted transferring fuel at 1.30pm on Wednesday, approximately 2.8 nautical miles off Kukup.

The crewmen, aged between 25 and 50, were later handed over to maritime authorities at Tanjung Pelepas and both vessels were taken to the Kukup Terminal.

According to Hean, the company had lost millions of Malaysian Ringgit in recent years from illegal transfers of marine fuel, which had always involved a particular Singapore-based shipping company.

Hean said the incidents had continued to take place even after the company installed CCTV cameras on board as unscrupulous crewmen tampered with the surveillance system.

“There is only so much we could do and I would like to thank the authorities for their swift action,” he said.

Hean commented that the company would be pressing charges against the crew as well as the owners of the Ocean Samudera.


Oriental Aquamarine vessel. HMM deploys Korea's first MR tanker with wing sail technology  

Oriental Aquamarine equipped with wind-assisted propulsion system expected to cut fuel consumption by up to 20%.

BC Ferries vessel render. ABB to supply hybrid-electric propulsion for BC Ferries' four new vessels  

Technology will enable ferries to run on biofuel or renewable diesel with battery storage.

Alternative marine fuels port graphic. LNG-fuelled boxships sustain alternative fuel orderbook share despite market slowdown  

Alternative fuels maintained 38% of gross tonnage orders in 2025, driven by container segment.

Conceptual diagram of the MOL–ITOCHU strategic alliance. MOL and ITOCHU sign MoU for cross-industry environmental attribute certificate partnership  

Japanese shipping and trading firms to promote EACs for reducing Scope 3 emissions in transport.

CPN as China's No. 1 marine biofuel supplier in 2025 graphic. Chimbusco Pan Nation delivers 170,000 tonnes of marine biofuel in China in 2025  

Supplier says volumes quadrupled year on year, with a 6,300-tonne B24 operation completed during the period.

V.Group and Njord logo side by side. V.Group acquires Njord to expand decarbonisation services for shipowners  

Maritime services provider buys Maersk Tankers-founded green technology business to offer integrated fuel-efficiency solutions.

Container vessel manoeuvring in port. Has Zhoushan just become the world's third-largest bunker port?  

With 2025 sales of 8.03m tonnes for the Chinese port, Q4 data for Antwerp-Bruges will decide which location takes third place.

Monjasa Oil & Shipping Trainee (MOST) trainees. Monjasa opens applications for global trainee programme  

Marine fuel supplier seeks candidates for MOST scheme spanning offices from Singapore to New York.

Singapore's first fully electric harbour tug. Singapore's first fully electric tug completes commissioning ahead of April deployment  

PaxOcean and ABB’s 50-tonne bollard-pull vessel represents an early step in harbour craft electrification.

Fuel for thought: Hydrogen report cover. Lloyd's Register report examines hydrogen's potential and challenges for decarbonisation  

Classification society highlights fuel's promise alongside safety, infrastructure, and cost barriers limiting maritime adoption.





 Recommended