Tue 7 Apr 2009, 13:32 GMT

EGCSA hails US-Canadian ECA proposal


Association says ECA plan is an opportunity for shipping to incorporate abatement technologies.



The Exhaust Gas Cleaning Systems Association (EGCSA) has today hailed news that the United States and Canada plans to introduce Emissions Control Areas (ECAs) in North America as an opportunity for shipping to widely incorporate abatement technologies in order to meet the impending laws.

The decision taken on 31st March by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Environment Canada will also endorse an 85% reduction in particulate matter – alongside Sulphur Oxide (SOx) and Nitrogen Oxide (NOx) reduction - by 2015.

This is the world’s first substantial ruling for the reduction of particulate matter from large ocean-going vessels. Whilst Emission Control Areas (ECAs) have been prevalent in Europe since 2006, neither of the European ECAs (The Baltic Sea and North Sea) have targeted the reduction of particulate matter, which is widely recognised as a major cause of cancer and other cardiovascular diseases in coastal areas.

"The decision to include particulate matter is even more significant as shipowners will be required to do more than switch to cleaner marine diesel or gasoil fuel, which can only reduce particulate matter by a nominal amount, while smaller and more harmful 2.5 particles may even increase when using cleaner fuels," the EGCSA said in a statement.

Several companies have developed scrubbing technology for marine applications with test results from seatrials revealing particulate matter reduction of around 80%. EGCSA's members are confident that that figure can be substantially improved with further development.

Donald Gregory, Director of EGCSA, said: “The US-Canada directive for 230 mile ECAs on the North American East and West coasts sets a new precedent for the reduction in pollution from ships. It has been well-documented that SOx and NOx emissions controls have been put in place through IMO MARPOL Annex VI, however particulate matter has been overlooked, up until now.

“This new ruling gives a clear mandate for the adoption of scrubbing technologies for the 90,000 port calls that are made by vessels every year in the US and Canada. – simply switching to a lighter marine diesel or gasoil will be a prohibitively costly means of meeting the proposed legislation.” Gregory added.

"The US–Canada proposal suggests meeting the new legislation will cost ship owners an additional $145 per tonne to move from high sulphur fuel oil (HSFO) to 0.1% sulphur marine fuel, however the differential reached was in excess of $500 per tonne in many ports in 2008," the EGCSA said.

While it is stipulated that 80% NOx must be removed by 2016 under the proposed legislation, the likelihood is that engine technology and additives can meet these requirements. Reducing emissions of SOx and particulate matter to meet the proposed US-Canadian standards can be achieved through the installation of scrubber technology for marine applications; rendering ships future proof to other ECAs currently under consideration. Payback periods when compared against the alternate cost of distillate fuel are miniscule when viewed against the capital cost of scrubber equipment and installation.

Particulate matter emissions from ocean-going ships are responsible for about 60,000 deaths a year from heart and lung-related cancers, according to research published by James Corbett, University of Delaware in 2007.

Corbett's report also stated that the number of premature deaths from ship emissions could rise by as much as 40 percent in the next four years because of increases in shipping activity, and it did not account for additional health impacts such as bronchitis and asthma related illnesses, estimated at 3.4 million instances in the US and Canada each year.

In the light of the recent G20 meeting and the re-confirmation of the benefits of world trade, the EGCSA said it believes now is the time for the shipping industry to take stock of the commercial benefits that the industry has enjoyed on the back of globalisation and balance that against the need to invest in technology for a sustainable future.



Mount Asahi vessel. CSSC delivers LNG dual-fuel bulker to Eastern Pacific nearly four months early  

210,000-tonne Mount Asahi handed over ahead of contract schedule.

Mount Vision vessel. New Times Shipbuilding delivers three LNG dual-fuel tankers in four days  

Chinese yard hands over one VLCC and two Aframax-size crude tankers within a single week.

Mercedes Pinto vessel TTS LNG bunkering. Baleària ferry completes LNG bunkering at regular berth in Las Palmas for first time  

LNG refuelling of Mercedes Pinto set to take place weekly without changing berth.

Baltic Timber vessel. Baltic Shipping Company takes delivery of wind-assisted hybrid coaster  

3,550-dwt vessel is fitted with Econowind VentoFoils and a battery package.

Pakistan flag. Vitol Bunkers launches first commercial bunkering service at Gwadar Port  

Company begins offering HSFO, VLSFO and LSMGO at the Pakistani deepwater port.

Port of Singapore. Trailing 3-month bunker sales fall to lowest since April 2025 in Singapore  

Bunker volume of 13.569m tonnes sold between April and June was worst result in 14 months.

Glander International Bunkering logo. Glander International Bunkering reports $23.4m pre-tax earnings amid volatile shipping markets  

Bunker trading company says new fuels volumes doubled over the past year, driven by client demand.

Aerial view of tanker vessel at sea. ISO-compliant fuels increasingly causing operational problems, Lloyd’s Register warns  

Latest FOBAS report finds fuel quality risk shifting beyond off-specification fuels.

Bioethanol bunkering at the Port of Santos. Bunker One completes Latin America’s first bioethanol bunkering of a deep-sea container vessel  

500,000-litre delivery at Santos marks a first for bioethanol as a marine fuel.

Maritime Technologies Forum (MTF) logo. MTF issues safety management guidelines for methanol-fuelled ships  

New MTF report offers recommendations for developing and strengthening safety management systems for methanol as a fuel.