BUNKER INDEX :: Price Index, News and Directory Information for the Marine Fuel Industry



« News Home
:: Monthly Archive

News Topics
:: Air Pollution
:: Agreements & M&A's
:: Alternative Fuels
:: BunkerBlog
:: Cargoes & Storage
:: Company News
:: Efficiency, Costs & Charges
:: Environment
:: Events
:: Financial
:: Fuel Quality & Testing
:: Lubes & Additives
:: Oil Spills
:: People
:: Port News
:: Projects
:: Regulation, Legal
:: Services, Products,Technology
:: Statistics & Research
:: Vessels

Regional Archive
:: Americas
:: Asia/Oceania
:: Europe
:: M.East/Africa


BUNKER INDEX :: Price Index, News and Directory Information for the Marine Fuel Industry
Home » News



Crew member files lawsuit against Vane Line Bunkering

Plaintiff alleges that 'negligence, carelessness and recklessness' of Vane Line resulted in his injury.



Image credit: Pixabay CC0


Updated on 17 May 2018 13:02 GMT

A lawsuit has been filed at New York Supreme Court, Ulster County, by a crew member against US transportation firm Vane Line Bunkering Inc. and its parent business The Vane Brothers Company, in addition to Dann Ocean Towing Inc. and the vessels DBL-25 and Ruby M.

Plaintiff Frank Whittaker claims that on April 5, 2015, he sustained bodily injuries, damages and other losses whilst working aboard the tanker barge DBL-25, which, he alleges, was "due to the negligence, carelessness and recklessness" of defendants Vane Line Bunkering and/or Vane Brothers.

Then, on March 19, 2016, Whittaker maintains that he "sustained continuing, enhanced and/or additional bodily injuries due to the negligence, carelessness and recklessness" of Vane Line Bunkering and/or Vane Brothers.

The plaintiff provides a long list of alleged failures in his claim, including that the defendant:

- Failed and neglected to maintain and to provide a safe and seaworthy vessel;

- Failed and neglected to man or equip the DBL-25 with sufficient crew to assist the plaintiff in his tasks aboard the DBL-25 while making up to the tugboat Ruby M;

- Failed and neglected to safely coordinate the work involving the DBL-25 and Ruby M;

- Failed and neglected to position or move the DBL-25 and/or the Ruby M so as to minimize and avoid injury;

- Failed and neglected to follow good and accepted safe marine, maritime and navigation practices with regard to the plaintiff, his job duties and both vessels - the DBL-25 and Ruby M;

- Failed and neglected to follow applicable company safety rules and other rules applicable to the vessels;

- Failed and neglected to equip the Ruby M with the adequate and safe towing gear and other equipment;

- Failed and neglected to continuously supervise the said vessels and the work performed by the plaintiff;

- Failed and neglected to provide a safe and secure workplace for the plaintiff;

- Failed and neglected to provide the plaintiff with a seaworthy and safe vessel upon which to work;

- Failed and neglected to adequately train the plaintiff to safely perform the work that led to his injury.

Dann Ocean Towing denies any wrongdoing. The case continues.

Bunker Index reported last year that Vane Line Bunkering was involved in another New York lawsuit over a barge captain who suffered a stroke.






Related Links:

Vane Line Bunkering faces lawsuit over barge captain who suffered stroke
ING loses appeal in OW Bunker case involving US supplier
Triton-linked firms ordered to pay $350k bond to avoid vessel arrest
OW plaintiffs resolve dispute after locking horns over who supplied fuel to bulker
United States

Latest News:

Holland America to outfit 11 ships for shore power following three-vessel project
IMO approves Initial Strategy follow-up programme
Renewable methanol offers long-term CO2 reduction solution: MethaShip
Oil and fuel oil hedging market update
Oil slips on likely rise in Saudi output and weekly oil stocks
Verifavia signs up Wallem and Seaborn
ExxonMobil launches cylinder oil for IMO 2020 fuels
The lowdown on bunker spill paperwork required in Singapore
MEPC 73: HFO ban events scheduled
Oil and fuel oil hedging market update
Brent climbs above $80 as supply concerns take centre stage
MEPC 73: IMO must renew commitment to Arctic HFO ban | CAA




Page Links:

Prices
Africa
Asia
Latin America
Middle East
North America
North Europe
South Europe
Index Summary
Price Highlights
Commentaries
Futures
Prices
Antwerp
Busan
Fujairah
Houston
Istanbul
Kaohsiung
Las Palmas
Maracaibo
New Orleans
Piraeus
Rio de Janeiro
Rotterdam
Santos
Singapore
News
Latest News
Blogs
Archive
Americas
Asia
Europe
Middle East
News
Air Pollution
Agreements & M&A's
Alternative Fuels
Cargoes & Storage
Efficiency, Costs & Charges
Environment
Events
Financial
Fuel Quality
Lubes & Additives
Oil Spills
People
Port News
Projects
Regulation/Legal
Services, Products, Technology
Statistics & Research
Vessels
Contact & Terms
Contact Us
Advertise
Terms & Conditions
Privacy Policy
Events
Upcoming Events