BUNKER INDEX :: Price Index, News and Directory Information for the Marine Fuel Industry



« News Home
:: Monthly Archive

News Topics
:: Air Pollution
:: Agreements & M&A's
:: Alternative Fuels
:: BunkerBlog
:: Cargoes & Storage
:: Company News
:: Efficiency, Costs & Charges
:: Environment
:: Events
:: Financial
:: Fuel Quality & Testing
:: Lubes & Additives
:: Oil Spills
:: People
:: Port News
:: Projects
:: Regulation, Legal
:: Services, Products,Technology
:: Statistics & Research
:: Vessels

Regional Archive
:: Americas
:: Asia/Oceania
:: Europe
:: M.East/Africa


BUNKER INDEX :: Price Index, News and Directory Information for the Marine Fuel Industry
Home » News



Maersk Ocean profit impacted by higher bunker costs... which surge to almost $1.2bn

Total spend on bunkers jumped YoY by 52.7% following Hamburg Sud takeover, whilst average fuel price was up 19.3%.



Image credit: Kees Torn Flickr CC BY-SA 2.0


Updated on 17 May 2018 09:05 GMT

Maersk's Ocean segment posted an operating profit (EBITDA) of $492 million for the first-quarter (Q1) of 2018, which was a year-on-year (YoY) improvement of 1.7 percent on the $484m figure recorded in Q1 2017.

Maersk said the result was impacted by higher unit costs due to rising bunker prices and adverse developments in exchange rates.

The total spend on marine fuels - following Maersk Line's acquisition of Hamburg Sud in November - jumped YoY by $412m, or 52.7 percent, to $1.194bn.

In a sequential comparison with Q4, marine fuel expenses were up $291m, or 32.2 percent.

The average price spent on bunkers by Ocean in Q1 was $382 per tonne - a rise of $62, or 19.3 percent, on the previous year, and a quarter-on-quarter (QoQ) increase of $42, or 12.4 percent.

The total amount of marine fuel consumed in Q1 increased YoY by 685,000 tonnes, or 28.0 percent, to 3,129,000 tonnes.

The unit cost at fixed bunker price jumped $150, or 8.6 percent, to $1,895 per forty equivalent unit (FFE), including income from vessel sharing agreements (VSAs). Overall unit costs for Ocean were 12 percent higher at 2,072 $/FFE, compared to 1,858 $/FFE the year before.

Providing a breakdown of the reasons for the 8.6 percent rise in the unit cost at fixed bunker price, Maersk explained that 2.5 percent was related to adverse exchange rate developments, 3.4 percent to changes in the portfolio mix following the inclusion of Hamburg Sud, and the remaining 2.7 percent primarily related to higher terminal and feedering costs.

Maersk also noted that Ocean's bunker efficiency deteriorated by 3.4 percent to 972 kg/FFE from last year's figure of 940 kg/FFE. Part of the deterioration, Maersk said, was due to the increased capacity committed to carrying volumes from the slot purchase agreements which are not counted as loaded volume.

The Ocean division achieved a 38 percent increase in revenue to $6.81bn, up from $4.95bn in the prior-year period, or 9 percent excluding the effect from Hamburg Sud.

Maersk's Ocean segment includes the ocean activities of Maersk's Liner Business (Maersk Line, MCC, Seago Line and Sealand) together with Hamburg Sud brands Hamburg Sud and Alianca as well as strategic transshipment hubs under the APM Terminals brand.

A.P. Moller - Maersk results

A.P. Moller - Maersk posted a Q1 underlying loss of $239m, down from the previous year's loss of $139m.

Revenue during the period rose by $2.15bn, or 30.3 percent, to $9.25bn.

Guidance for 2018

In its guidance for 2018, A.P. Moller - Maersk said that a $100 change in the price of bunker fuel would lead to the group's underlying result varying by $400m.

Maersk Line says it expects underlying profit in 2018 to be above last year's figure of $356m, and EBITDA to be between $4.0bn and $5.0bn - which would beat 2017's $3.5bn.






Related Links:

Maersk targets 60% CO2 emissions reduction by 2020
Maersk Line recorded two incidents of sulphur non-compliance in 2017
Maersk Line spent $1.2bn more on bunkers in 2017; average price was highest since 2014
Maersk Line posts $336m profit swing despite spending $218m more on bunkers

Latest News:

Holland America to outfit 11 ships for shore power following three-vessel project
IMO approves Initial Strategy follow-up programme
Renewable methanol offers long-term CO2 reduction solution: MethaShip
Oil and fuel oil hedging market update
Oil slips on likely rise in Saudi output and weekly oil stocks
Verifavia signs up Wallem and Seaborn
ExxonMobil launches cylinder oil for IMO 2020 fuels
The lowdown on bunker spill paperwork required in Singapore
MEPC 73: HFO ban events scheduled
Oil and fuel oil hedging market update
Brent climbs above $80 as supply concerns take centre stage
MEPC 73: IMO must renew commitment to Arctic HFO ban | CAA




Page Links:

Prices
Africa
Asia
Latin America
Middle East
North America
North Europe
South Europe
Index Summary
Price Highlights
Commentaries
Futures
Prices
Antwerp
Busan
Fujairah
Houston
Istanbul
Kaohsiung
Las Palmas
Maracaibo
New Orleans
Piraeus
Rio de Janeiro
Rotterdam
Santos
Singapore
News
Latest News
Blogs
Archive
Americas
Asia
Europe
Middle East
News
Air Pollution
Agreements & M&A's
Alternative Fuels
Cargoes & Storage
Efficiency, Costs & Charges
Environment
Events
Financial
Fuel Quality
Lubes & Additives
Oil Spills
People
Port News
Projects
Regulation/Legal
Services, Products, Technology
Statistics & Research
Vessels
Contact & Terms
Contact Us
Advertise
Terms & Conditions
Privacy Policy
Events
Upcoming Events