This is a legacy page. Please click here to view the latest version.
Thu 22 Sep 2016, 07:23 GMT

New guides to help avoid bunker disputes and handle claims


Publications provide advice on how to avoid bunker disputes and how to handle them if a claim arises.



A pair of new publications have been published by West of England P&I providing advice on how to avoid bunker disputes and how to handle them if a claim arises.

The Loss Prevention Bulletin 'Bunker Quality Disputes Part 1: Practical and Technical Measures' deals with the actions and steps that should be considered in order to avoid off-specification bunker disputes, whilst the Claims Guide 'Bunker Quality Disputes Part 2: Legal and Claims Handling Considerations' sets out the legal and claims handling steps that should be taken in the event of an off-specification bunker claim arising.

Avoiding disputes

"When a vessel has been provided with off-specification bunkers the consequences can be severe, possibly leading to the breakdown of the vessel's machinery. Even if off-specification bunkers do not result in a breakdown, the loss of time and expenses incurred if it is necessary to de-bunker or deviate to stem fresh bunkers can be significant," West of England P&I explains in the Loss Prevention Bulletin.

The document addresses onboard procedures for fuel sampling, the bunker delivery note (BDN), onboard fuel testing, fuel blending and storage. It also takes a look at the factors that can lead to off-specification and/or contaminated fuel.

Handling claims

"Off-specification bunkers can potentially give rise to claims under an owner's hull and machinery insurance as well as under Club cover, whether as a FD&D claim against time charterers or bunker suppliers or a P&I claim such as for delay in delivery of cargo if that causes the cargo to deteriorate. There may also be a charterer's liability to owners for providing off-specification bunkers," West of England P&I says in the Claims Guide.

This report looks at the contractual obligations under a time charter party, handling off-specification bunker claims and common allegations and defences to off-specification bunker claims.

Links to the two documents have been provided below.

Loss Prevention Bulletin - 'Bunker Quality Disputes Part 1: Practical and Technical Measures'

Claims Guide - 'Bunker Quality Disputes Part 2: Legal and Claims Handling Considerations'


Arctic Tern vessel. Wallenius Wilhelmsen takes delivery of first methanol-ready Shaper Class vessel  

The dual-fuel Arctic Tern will enter service on the Asia–Europe trade almost immediately.

Al Muraykh vessel. Hapag-Lloyd signs shore power agreement with Hamburg Port Authority  

Deal commits the carrier to using onshore power supply at all Hamburg terminals.

Dorthe Karin Bendtsen, KPI OceanConnect. KPI OceanConnect reports 21% rise in pre-tax earnings for 2025/26  

Marine fuel firm delivers 13 million tonnes and expands carbon markets capabilities amid geopolitical turbulence.

VTTI logo. VTTI Dalian completes first large-scale 'green methanol' vessel loading  

Cargo to be supplied as marine fuel in Shanghai.

Steff Tan, Oilmar. Oilmar appoints Steff Tan as marine fuels trader in Singapore  

New hire's background spans bunker operations, logistics, commercial trading, marketing, and business development.

Feng Da Hai vessel. Cosco Shipping adds methanol-ready bulk carrier Feng Da Hai to fleet  

The 64,000-tonne vessel is equipped with a methanol fuel system for future low-carbon operations.

Oilmar office in Dubai. Oilmar welcomes summer intern to Dubai branch  

Arpit Aryan will rotate across the bunker fuel trading, finance and operations departments.

Aerial view of the Dubai skyline. Oilmar takes on trading and finance intern in Dubai  

New intern to rotate across trading, operations and finance teams.

Seaspan and Maersk signing. Seaspan and Maersk deepen fleet efficiency collaboration with $75m upgrade programme  

Retrofit package for four 13,000-teu vessels includes installation of shaft generator to reduce auxiliary engine fuel consumption.

European Parliament building in Brussels. EU Parliament vote on soy biofuels could expose bloc to $5.6bn a year in trade sanctions  

MEPs reject regulation that would have phased out soy biofuels, risking WTO retaliation penalties.


↑  Back to Top